Beyoncé Removes ‘Milkshake’ From ‘Energy’ After Kelis Calls Her Out On ‘Theft’

beyonce-removes-kelis - Credit: Brook Kraft/Getty Images

beyonce-removes-kelis – Credit: Brook Kraft/Getty Images

Beyoncé has removed the use of “Milkshake” from her new song “Energy” after Kelis ripped the singer for featuring the 2003 hit song, calling it an act of “stealing”.

It’s been an unexpectedly rough release week for Beyoncé, who despite receiving rave reviews for her disco album Renaissancehad a number of blips and tweaks after the songs were released.

More from Rolling Stone

Days before its release last Friday, the album was leaked online – a rare problem for the famously buttoned-up artist. Then on Monday, Beyoncé announced she would remove the word “spaz” from her song “Heated” after backlash from critics who said the word is a qualified insult. (Lizzo similarly dropped the word from her song “Grrrls” earlier this summer.)

Now, Tidal and Apple appear to have removed an interlude of Kelis’ song “Milkshake” that appears at the end of “Energy.” In a brief glitch, Tidal was only playing the interlude’s individual vocals while the rest of the nearly two-minute track was muted. It’s unclear when other streaming services will update the track to their platforms. Reps for Beyoncé, Kelis and Tidal did not immediately respond Rolling stonerequests for comment.

The feud between the two artists began hours before the album’s official release when Kelis took to her chef’s Instagram account to express her disappointment that her song was used and not given the courtesy of a heads-up, how he probably asked for her. blessing. It’s not collaboration, it’s theft,” he wrote.

“My mind is blown because the level of disrespect and utter ignorance of all three parties involved is astounding,” he added. “Nothing is ever as it seems, some of the people in this business have no soul or integrity and have fooled everyone.”

Full credits later revealed that the song in question was “Milkshake,” with Kelis’ former producers Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo credited on the track. Beyoncé’s website also noted that the song was an interpolation, which takes an existing sound and alters it, while the sample is taken directly from a song without changes.

Regardless of whether the song was used in a small way or tweaked to fit Beyoncé’s dance track, Kelis wasn’t happy, saying the whole situation was a “starting point” for her. “It’s beyond this song at this point,” she wrote in an Instagram caption. “There are bullies, undercovers and gangsters in this industry who grin and get away with it until someone says enough is enough. Well, I’m saying it today. I am coming for what belongs to me and I want reparations.”

Kelis also invited Williams, a former close friend who worked with her exclusively alongside Chad Hugo on her first two albums. Their relationship soured after Kelis claimed Williams and Hugo had “lied and tricked” her into a raw deal. Instead of dividing things “33/33/33”, Kelis said The guardian in 2020she didn’t go royalty free on her early music and ended up making money only from her early albums from touring.

She addressed the controversial relationship in her Instagram video, saying: “The post was stolen, people were cheated out of rights. It happens all the time, especially then. So it’s not about me being mad at Beyoncé.”

“Farrell knows better,” he added. “This is a direct blow to me [and] he does these things all the time. The reason I’m upset is because I know it was on purpose.”

The best of Rolling Stone

Click here to read the full article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.